Akuntabilitas Pidana di Era Penyalahgunaan Kecerdasan Buatan ditinjau dari Asas Legalitas

Yuni Ginting

doi:10.64843/prolev.v3i3.78

Authors

Yuni Ginting Pelita Harapan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64843/prolev.v3i3.78

Keywords:

Criminal accountability; Artificial intelligence (AI); Principle of legality

Abstract

The development of artificial intelligence (AI) presents new challenges in criminal law, especially in determining the subject responsible for actions arising from autonomous systems. The phenomenon of AI misuse raises issues regarding the application of the principle of legality, which demands clarity on the perpetrator, the act, and the sanction. This research aims to examine how the principle of legality can address the problem of criminal accountability in the digital era. The method used is normative juridical with a statutory and conceptual approach, through analysis of national regulations and international legal principles related to criminal responsibility. The results show that the principle of legality remains relevant but requires reinterpretation so that it can cover acts mediated by technology. It is concluded that strengthening legal norms and responsibility based on human control is necessary to maintain legal certainty and prevent a vacuum of accountability in the age of artificial intelligence.

References

Andi Hamzah. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2008.

Arief, Barda Nawawi, dan Muladi. Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana. Bandung: Alumni, 2012.

Arief, Barda Nawawi. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2010.

Asaro, Peter. “A Body to Kick, but Still No Soul to Damn: Legal Perspectives on Robotics.” In Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics, edited by Patrick Lin, Keith Abney, and George A. Bekey, 169–186. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012.

European Commission. White Paper on Artificial Intelligence: A European Approach to Excellence and Trust. Brussels: European Union, 2020.

Floridi, Luciano, and J. W. Sanders. “On the Morality of Artificial Agents.” Minds and Machines 14, no. 3 (2004): 349–379.

Hildebrandt, Mireille. Smart Technologies and the End(s) of Law: Novel Entanglements of Law and Technology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Nomor 20/PUU-XIV/2016 tentang Prinsip Kepastian Hukum. Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi RI, 2016.

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Nomor 65/PUU-VIII/2010 tentang Asas Legalitas. Jakarta: Mahkamah Konstitusi RI, 2010.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2014.

Moeljatno. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2002.

Mulyadi, Lilik. Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2015.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2014), 35.

Poernomo, Bambang. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1984.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2006.

Ramadhani, Rahmat. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana dalam Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan.” Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan 51, no. 2 (2021): 245–263.

Rosadi, Sinta Dewi. Perlindungan Privasi dan Data Pribadi dalam Era Ekonomi Digital. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2019.

Saleh, Roeslan. Segi-Segi Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1983.

Soponyono, Eko. Hukum Pidana dalam Konteks Cybercrime dan Artificial Intelligence. Semarang: UNDIP Press, 2020.

United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute (UNICRI). Artificial Intelligence and Robotics: Legal and Ethical Implications. Turin: UNICRI, 2021.

Widodo, Joko. Tanggung Jawab Pidana Korporasi di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016.