Authority of Prosecutors in Enforcing Money Laundering Crimes in Strategic Economic Cases

Junika Gabriella

Authors

Junika Gabriella Universitas Tarumanegara

Keywords:

money laundering, asset recovery, prosecutorial authority, strategic economic crimes, evidentiary construction

Abstract

Abstract

Money laundering in strategic economic crimes requires a law enforcement approach that goes beyond punitive sanctions and prioritizes asset recovery to restore state financial losses. This study examines the evidentiary construction of money laundering offenses in the commodity trading case involving PT Timah Tbk. and evaluates the effectiveness of an asset recovery–oriented approach in recent law enforcement practices. The research applies a normative legal method through statutory and case approaches, supported by library research as the primary data collection technique. The analysis highlights the expansion of admissible evidence, including the recognition of electronic evidence under the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) and the Law on Electronic Information and Transactions (Indonesia), as well as prosecutorial authority under Law Number 11 of 2021 on the Prosecutor’s Office of the Republic of Indonesia. The findings indicate that incorporating money laundering charges into indictments broadens the evidentiary scope to include placement, layering, and integration stages, thereby enabling broader asset tracing and control. However, the disparity between state losses and assets successfully recovered demonstrates that the effectiveness of asset recovery remains structurally limited in achieving proportional and sustainable economic restitution.

Keywords: money laundering; asset recovery; prosecutorial authority; strategic economic crimes; evidentiary construction.

References

REFERENCES

Books

Margono, R. (2026). Corporate criminal liability in money laundering: Theoretical construction, regulation, and judicial practice in Indonesia. Professor Rudi Margono.

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Legal research: Revised edition. Medium Pregnancy.

Sutedi, A. (2023). Banking law: A review of money laundering, mergers, liquidations, and bankruptcy. Graphic Rays.

Syahrin, A., Anggusti, I. M., Alsa, A. A., & Syarifuddin, S. (2024). Corruption and money laundering crimes in the natural resources sector. Merdeka Kreasi Group.

Waluyo, B. (2022). Eradication of Corruption: Strategy and Optimization. Graphic Rays.

Journal

Cristina, J., & Manalu, I. (2025). Analysis of the role of evidence and witness statements in determining criminal court decisions. Journal of Law and Public Policy Studies, 3(1), 245–263.

Firmansyah, V. Z., & Syam, F. (2021). Strengthening state administrative laws to prevent corrupt practices in the Indonesian government. Integrity: Journal of Anti-Corruption, 7(2), 325–344.

Harefa, B. (2025). Asset forfeiture of money laundering crimes: The protection of third parties in good faith from the perspective of Indonesian law. Legal Treatise, 21(2), 135–149.

Mahfuzh, L. F., Sinambela, A. A., Ritonga, J. S., Anugrah, A., & Syarifuddin, S. (2026). Money laundering in special crimes. Scientific Journal of Student Research, 4(1), 1247–1254.

Vanessa, V., & Firmansyah, H. (2025). Analysis of the validity of electronic evidence in criminal trial proceedings and the implementation of its admissibility (Judgment study): Analysis of the validity of electronic evidence in criminal trial proceedings and the implementation of its admissibility (Decision study). Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review, 20(4), 10–21070.

Wiraguna, S. A. (2024). Dynamics of corruption and money laundering at PT Timah: Supervision and challenges. JPS, 3(1).

Thesis/Dissertation

Agnes, A. A. (2024). The authority of the prosecutor's office in the implementation of restitution against perpetrators of sexual violence crimes (Study on the South Lampung District Attorney's Office).

Faiz, A. (2024). Legal aspects of money laundering with smurfing mode (Doctoral dissertation, Malikussaleh University).

Hutasoit, R. (2025). The ideal concept of asset recovery from corruption crimes based on progressive law (Doctoral dissertation, Sultan Agung Islamic University).

Kemal, G. (2023). The authority of the prosecutor's office as a single prosecution system in corruption cases (Master's thesis, Sultan Agung Islamic University, Indonesia).

Sibarani, H. (2025). Money laundering by corporations through the financial system, corporate roles and responsibilities (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Kristen Indonesia).

Internet

Bloomberg Technoz. (2024). Can 6 tin smelters loot corruption, profit or profit?

https://www.bloombergtechnoz.com/detail-news/86547/dapat-6-smelter-timah-rampasan-korupsi-tins-untung-atau-buntung.

Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia. (2024). Attorney General: State losses due to tin commodity corruption to Rp300 trillion.

https://story.kejaksaan.go.id/berita-utama/jaksa-agung-kerugian-negara-akibat-korupsi-komoditas-timah-jadi-rp300-triliun-141575-mvk.html.

Financial Transaction Reporting and Analysis Center. (2025). Statistics on suspicious financial transaction reports in 2025. Retrieved February 27, 2026, from

https://www.ppatk.go.id/statistik.

Souisa, H. (2024, April 4). The role and mode in the PT Timah corruption case which cost the state Rp271 trillion. ABC News (English).

https://www.abc.net.au/indonesian/2024-04-04/peran-dan-modus-korupsi-timah-harvey-moeis/103667550