The Authority Of The Executive Officer As A Curator For The Management Of Confiscated Assets/Evidence In The Framework Of Restoring The Rights Of Criminal Acts Victims In The Form Of Restitution

Authors

  • Radityo Wisnu Aji Prosecutor

Keywords:

public prosecutor, executor, restitution, seized assets, victim's right recovery

Abstract

The Public Prosecutor (Prosecutor), as an executive officer, holds constitutional authority to execute court decisions that have obtained permanent legal force. In practice, however, prosecutors frequently encounter juridical challenges when court rulings order the management, auction, and distribution of seized assets or evidentiary goods for the purpose of restoring victims’ rights, including compensation, restitution, and rehabilitation. These challenges arise primarily due to the absence of clear normative regulations governing the legal basis and procedural mechanisms for prosecutors to exercise such authority as executors. This issue becomes increasingly complex when judicial legal reasoning (legal finding) results in progressive decisions that are not supported by adequate implementing regulations. This article aims to analyze the ideal scope of prosecutorial authority as an executive officer in managing seized assets and to formulate an ideal model for asset administration and liquidation oriented toward the recovery of victims’ rights in criminal cases. The research employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and case study approaches, particularly examining Decision of the Banjarmasin District Court Number 343/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Bjm. The findings indicate a regulatory vacuum and normative disharmony between statutory laws, Supreme Court regulations, and internal prosecutorial guidelines, which hinder the effective restoration of victims’ rights. Therefore, strengthening prosecutorial authority in conducting asset tracing, execution seizure, and asset liquidation is necessary by adopting principles of bankruptcy trusteeship (curatorship), implemented in a proportional, transparent, and accountable manner. This model is expected to promote restorative justice, ensure legal certainty, and enhance legal utility for victims of criminal offenses.

References

Arief, Barda Nawawi. “Criminal Law Policy in the Protection of Crime Victims.”Journal of Legal Issues.

Atmasasmita, Romli. “Criminal Justice System Reform from a Restorative Justice Perspective.”Journal of Law and Development.

Barda Nawawi Arief.Anthology of Criminal Law Policy. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Eddy O.S. Hiariej. Principles of Criminal Law. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka.

Hiariej, Eddy O.S. “Restitution and Compensation for Victims of Crime in the Indonesian Criminal Law System.”Indonesian Journal of Legislation.

Lilik Mulyadi.Criminal Procedure Law: Normative, Theoretical, Practical and Problems. Bandung: Alumni.

M. Yahya Harahap.Discussion of Problems and Implementation of the Criminal Procedure Code. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Muladi and Barda Nawawi Arief.Criminal Theory and Policy. Bandung: Alumni.

Mulyadi, Lilik. “The Implementation of Criminal Decisions and Its Problems in Judicial Practice.”Judicial Journal.

R. Soesilo.Criminal Code (KUHP) and its Commentaries. Bogor: Politeia.

Rahardjo, Satjipto. “Progressive Law as a Basis for Protecting Victims’ Rights.”Pro Justitia Law Journal.

Romli Atmasasmita.Contemporary Criminal Justice System. Jakarta: Kencana.

Santoso, Topo. “The Development of the Concept of Restorative Justice in the Criminal Justice System.”Indonesian Journal of Criminology.

Satjipto Rahardjo.Law and Social Change. Bandung: Alumni.

Soekanto, Soerjono. “Law Enforcement and the Factors That Influence It.”Journal of Law and Development.

Soerjono Soekanto.Introduction to Legal Research. Jakarta: UI Press.

Sulaiman, King Faisal. “The Authority of the Prosecutor as Executor of Criminal Decisions.”Jurnal Jus Quia Justum.

Topo Santoso.Criminology. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.

Wiyanto, Agus. “Confiscation and Confiscation of Assets in Criminal Acts.”IUS Law Journal.

Yulianto, Ahmad. “Restitution as an Instrument for Restoring the Rights of Crime Victims.”Journal Legal Finding.

Downloads

Published

21-04-2026

How to Cite

Radityo Wisnu Aji. 2026. “The Authority Of The Executive Officer As A Curator For The Management Of Confiscated Assets/Evidence In The Framework Of Restoring The Rights Of Criminal Acts Victims In The Form Of Restitution”. The Prosecutor Law Review 4 (1). https://prolev.kejaksaan.go.id/kejaksaan/article/view/84.