Legal Analysis of the Prosecutor's Office Performance in Handling Mega Corruption Cases in Indonesia: Analisis Hukum Terhadap Kinerja Kejaksaan dalam Menangani Kasus-Kasus Mega Korupsi di Indonesia

Meryana Rajagukguk; M. Alirahman Djoyosugito

doi:10.64843/prolev.v3i2.74

Authors

Meryana Rajagukguk Kejaksaan Agung
M. Alirahman Djoyosugito Kejaksaan Agung RI, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64843/prolev.v3i2.74

Keywords:

Attorney General's Office, Effectiveness, Institutional Barriers, Law Enforcement, Mega Corruption

Abstract

The handling of mega corruption cases such as BLBI, Jiwasraya, and Asabri serves as a key indicator in measuring the effectiveness of the Attorney General's Office as a law enforcement institution. This study aims to analyze the role and performance of the Attorney General's Office in dealing with large-scale corruption cases and to identify the inhibiting factors that affect it. The research method used is normative juridical with a literature study approach, focusing on statutory regulations, court decisions, as well as relevant literature and scientific journals. The results show that although the Attorney General's Office possesses a strong legal basis and authority, various obstacles remain, such as limited human resources, weak inter-institutional coordination, and external pressures. The conclusion of this study indicates that the effectiveness of the Attorney General's Office in eradicating mega corruption requires institutional strengthening, system improvement, and increased integrity and professionalism among law enforcement officers.

References

A.A. Anwar Prabu Mangkunegara, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan (Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2015).

Agus Dwiyanto, Mewujudkan Good Governance Melalui Pelayanan Publik (Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2006).

Dhaniswara, Puandita, Nabila Karimah, Muhammad Gustaf Aria, dan Irwan Triadi. “Analisis Kinerja Kejaksaan Agung Dalam Mengungkap Dan Menyelesaikan Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi Timah Senilai 271 Triliun.” Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan 11, no. 2.B (Februari 2025): 202–209. https://doi.org/10.31289/jiwp.v11i2.9831.

Herman Sofyandi, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2008).

Misbah, Revalyza, Tias Rahma Dewi, Mega Arinda Pramessella, dan Ardhana Ulfa Azis. “Korupsi Rp. 271 Triliun dan Krisis Tata Kelola Pemerintahan: Implikasinya terhadap Demokrasi dan Kesenjangan Sosial.” The Indonesian Journal of Politics and Policy 6, no. 2 (2024): 91–103. https://journal.unsika.ac.id/index.php/IJPP.

Pratiwi, Andriwani, Abdul Kadir Adys, dan Abdi. “Analisis Kinerja Kejaksaan Negeri Dalam Penanganan Perkara Korupsi.” Kajian Ilmiah Mahasiswa Administrasi Publik (KIMAP) 5, no. 1 (2024): 158–168. https://doi.org/10.26618/kimap.v5i1.14053.

Putra, Muhammad Gempa Awaljon, dan Mahfud Dahlan. “Kendala Yang Dihadapi Oleh Kejaksaan Tinggi Aceh Dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Syiah Kuala Law Journal 2, no. 2 (2018): 170–185.

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D (Bandung: Alfabeta, 2019).

Tarigan, Edi Syahjuri, Marlina, dan Taufik Siregar. “Analisis Hukum Peran Kejaksaan Dalam Penuntutan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Kasus di Kejaksaan Negeri Tebing Tinggi).” ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum 2, no. 2 (2020): 156–169. https://doi.org/10.31289/arbiter.v2i2.131

Viranti, Maura, Pradipta Larasati, Rain Victoria, dan Taun Taun. “Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Efektivitas Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Korupsi Berdasarkan UU No. 1 Tahun 2023.” Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara 3, no. 2 (2025): 98–114. https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v3i2.1839