Pengawasan Kesehatan Yustisial dan Peran RS Adhyaksa dalam Mencegah Penyalahgunaan Alasan Medis di Sistem Hukum Indonesia

Adri Nurrakhmat

doi:10.64843/prolev.v3i1.69

Authors

Adri Nurrakhmat Kejaksaan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64843/prolev.v3i1.69

Keywords:

Misuse of Health Claims, RS Adhyaksa, Judicial System, Legal Transparency, Legal Prediction 2045

Abstract

The misuse of health reasons by suspects or defendants in Indonesia's judicial system poses a significant challenge to the effectiveness of law enforcement. This study aims to analyze the impact of such misuse and evaluate the role of RS Adhyaksa as a judicial medical institution in ensuring transparency and fairness in the legal system. The research employs a qualitative approach using literature review and Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) to collect data from legal sources, academic journals, and real case studies. The findings indicate that without strict intervention and regulation, the misuse of health claims is projected to increase significantly by 2045, leading to prolonged legal processes and decreased public trust in the judiciary. Conversely, strengthening RS Adhyaksa’s role in verifying detainee health claims can reduce medical manipulation, enhance legal effectiveness, and optimize state budget allocations. The study concludes that reinforcing regulations and implementing technology in the judicial health system are crucial steps to ensuring a fair and transparent legal framework for the future.

References

Buku

• Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press.

• Miller, R. L., & Brewer, J. D. (2003). The A-Z of Social Research. Sage Publications.

• Packer, H. (1968). The Limits of the Criminal Sanction. Stanford University Press.

• Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.

• Taleb, N. N. (2007). The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable. Random House.

Jurnal Ilmiah dan Paper

• Bennett, N., & Lemoine, G. J. (2014). What VUCA Really Means for You. Harvard Business Review.

• Snowden, D. J., & Boone, M. E. (2007). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making. Harvard Business Review.

• Lipshitz, R., & Strauss, O. (1997). Coping with Uncertainty: A Naturalistic Decision-Making Analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.

• Journal of Medical Systems. (2020). Implementation of EMR for Judicial Transparency. 44(7), 1-10.

• Leiden Law School. (2019). Forensic Medicine and Law: Best Practices for Legal Practitioners. The Hague: Leiden University Press.

• Jurnal Integritas KPK. (2018). Menyoal Alasan Sakit dalam Mengajukan Penundaan Penahanan Para Tersangka Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Diakses dari https://jurnal.kpk.go.id/index.php/integritas/article/download/152/54/537

• Jurnal Hukum Responsif FH UNPAB. (2018). Penangguhan Penahanan dengan Jaminan. Diakses dari https://jurnal.pancabudi.ac.id/index.php/hukumresponsif/article/download/420/397/

• JIST. (n.d.). Pelayanan Kesehatan, Warga Binaan Pemasyarakatan, Unit Pelaksana Teknis Pemasyarakatan. Diakses dari https://jist.publikasiindonesia.id/index.php/jist/article/download/47/123

Peraturan-Peraturan

• Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2021 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia.

• Undang-Undang No. 17 Tahun 2023 tentang Kesehatan.

• Peraturan Jaksa Agung No. PER-30/A/JA/10/2014 tentang Organisasi dan Tata Kerja RSU Adhyaksa.

• Peraturan Pemerintah No. 28 Tahun 2024 tentang Penyelenggaraan Upaya Kesehatan.

• Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung No. 1 Tahun 1989 tentang Pembantaran.

• Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP), 1981.

• Peraturan Gubernur DKI Jakarta No. 54 Tahun 2019 tentang Pembentukan, Organisasi dan Tata Kerja Rumah Sakit Umum Adhyaksa.

Situs Web dan Laporan Resmi

• Dinkes Babel. (2023). Undang-Undang Kesehatan Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 Sah Berlaku. Diakses dari https://dinkes.babelprov.go.id/content/undang-undang-kesehatan-nomor-17-tahun-2023-sah-berlaku-ini-poin-pentingnya

• MaPPI FHUI. (2023). Pedoman Nomor 2 Tahun 2023 tentang Penanganan Perkara Penyandang Disabilitas. Diakses dari https://mappifhui.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Pedoman-Nomor-2-Tahun-2023-disabilitas.pdf

• LBH Masyarakat. (2018). Pembantaran: Pemenuhan Hak Atas Kesehatan Tahanan. Diakses dari https://lbhmasyarakat.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/121118_Paper-Pembantaran_Final_FA_APLayout.pdf

• Komnas HAM. (2020). Laporan Penelitian Penyalahgunaan Alasan Sakit dalam Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Komnas HAM.

• Ombudsman Republik Indonesia. (2022). Evaluasi Sistem Pembantaran Tahanan di Indonesia. Jakarta: ORI.

• National Health Service (NHS). (2020). Forensic and Secure Mental Health Services. London: NHS.

• World Health Organization. (2021). WHO Guidelines for Prison Health Services. Geneva: WHO.

• United Nations. (2015). Nelson Mandela Rules: Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners. New York: UN Publications.

• Eprints UMS. (n.d.). Pembantaran Penahanan Tersangka dalam Perspektif. Diakses dari https://eprints.ums.ac.id/32100/8/NASKAH%20PUBLIKASI.pdf

• Hukumonline. (n.d.). Pengertian, Prosedur, dan Syarat Penangguhan Penahanan. Diakses dari https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/penangguhan-penahanan-lt61d4ff4

• Kompasiana. (2024). Kehadiran RS Adhyaksa Banten, Bukti Nyata Kejaksaan RI Peduli Kesehatan Masyarakat. Diakses dari https://www.kompasiana.com/cakbejo1202/66f6acfa34777c2c940c09e2/kehadiran-rs-adhyaksa-banten-bukti-nyata-kejaksaan-ri-peduli-kesehatan-masyarakat

• Semanticscholar. (n.d.). Pembantaran Penahanan Terhadap Tersangka dalam Perspektif HAM. Diakses dari https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b47a/04cdaa1186b322bc7cc4ef3c59ebe4b480d0.pdf

• Repository UKI. (n.d.). Cases of Bribery and Gratification in Bureaucracy De. Diakses dari http://repository.uki.ac.id/10203/6/CorruptionInIndonesianReformedEra.pdf

• EJournal Unsrat. (2019). Penegakan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Kejahatan di Bidang Kesehatan. Diakses dari https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/26791