The Konsep Ideal Penyitaan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana

Asmadi Syam; Mohd Din; Devi Safliana

doi:10.64843/prolev.v3i1.68

Authors

Asmadi Syam Kejaksaan
Mohd Din Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala
Devi Safliana Kejaksaan Negeri Banda Aceh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64843/prolev.v3i1.68

Keywords:

confiscation, Prosecution, Criminal Justice System

Abstract

The basic concept of confiscation still refers to Article 38 Paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and can only be carried out by investigators. In its development, this concept is no longer relevant to maintain, because it is known that in handling cases many items/objects are found after the prosecution process, so for its validity an acquisition method is needed so that it can be considered in the judge's decision. This research aims to elaborate on the authority of confiscation at the prosecution process and its juridical impact as well as the ideal concept of confiscation. The research method used is normative legal research with secondary data consisting of primary, subsidiary and tertiary legal materials. The research results show that the authority of confiscation at the prosecution process is still contradicted each other with the formal legality of the Criminal Procedure Code. The ideal concept of confiscation must start from a change in the definition of confiscation, which is known as an action by law enforcement officials to take control of movable and immovable property, including electronic devices/electronic information systems for the purposes of proving a criminal act at every level of case handling, as well as the concept of confiscating collateral as in civil law. adopted as an effort to guarantee the return of state losses.

References

Achmad, Mukti Fajar dan Yulianto. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2017.

Amiruddin dan Zainal Asikin. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo, 2004.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly, and M. Ali Safa’at. Teori Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum. Mahkamah Konstitusi RI, 2006. http://www.pusdikmin.com/perpus/file/TEORI_HANS_KELSEN_TENTANG_HUKUM.pdf.

Asshidiqie, Jimly. Konstitusi Dan Konstitusionalisme. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011.

———. Konstitusi Dan Konstitutionalisme. Jakarta: Konstitusi Pres, 2005.

———. Teori & Aliran Penafsiran Hukum Tata Negara. Cetakan I. Jakarta: Ind. Hil, 1997.

Ćosić, Jasmin, Zoran Ćosić, and Miroslav Bača. “An Ontological Approach to Study and Manage Digital Chain of Custody of Digital Evidence.” Journal of Information and Organizational Sciences 35, no. 1 (2011).

Din, Mohd. Negara Hukum Dan Kebijakan Kriminal Dalam Islam. Banda Aceh: Bandar Publishing, 2018.

Djuniarti Djuniarti. “BERBAGAI BENTUK PEMERIKSAAN TAMBAHAN OLEH KEJAKSAAN DALAM PROSES PRAPENUNTUTAN PADA PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI VARIOUS FORMS OF ADDITIONAL EXAMINATION ATTORNEY BY THE PRE PROSECUTION IN THE CASE ON CRIMINAL ACTS OF CORRUPTION.” JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND SOCIAL SCIENCE 3, no. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.55606/jass.v3i2.17.

Easter, Lalola, Kurnia Ramadhana, and Diky Anandya. “Urgensi Pengaturan Sita Jaminan Dalam Penanganan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” In Laporan Penelitian Indonesia Corruption Watch, 2022.

Hiariej, Eddy OS. Hukum Acara Pidana. Tanggerang: Universitas Terbuka, 2017.

———. Teori Dan Hukum Pembuktian. Jakarta: Erlangga, 2012.

HR, Ridwan. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2013.

Indoharto. Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1994.

Izzati, Ratih Mannul. “Dampak Yuridis Pemeriksaan Setempat (Gerechtelijke Plaatsopneming) Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana Dipandang Dari Aspek Pertimbangan Hukum Putusan Perkara Pidana.” Jurnal Law Reform, 2012. https://www.neliti.com/publications/107976/dampak-yuridis-pemeriksaan-setempat-gerechtelijke-plaatsopneming-dalam-hukum-aca diakses pada 1 Desember 2021.

Johnny Ibrahim. Teori Dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayu Media Publishing, 2006.

Khalid, Afif. “Penafsiran Hukum Oleh Hakim Dalam Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia.” Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum 6, no. 11 (2014). https://doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v6i11.196.

Kurniawan, Mahendra. Pedoman Naska Akademik PERDA Partisipatif. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Total Media, 2007.

“Laporan Hasil Penyelarasan Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang Tentang Perampasan Aset Tindak Pidana,” 2015. https://www.bphn.go.id/data/documents/PENYELARASAN-NASKAH-AKADEMIKPERAMPASAN-ASET.PDF.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Kencaana Pranada Media, 2008.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, n.d.

Pakarti, Moch Bagoes. “Manajemen Pengelolaan Bukti Digital Untuk Meningkatkan Aksesibilitas Laboratorium Forensika Digital.” Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2020. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/28258.

Prayudi, Yudi, and Azhari SN. “Digital Chain of Custody: State of The Art.” International Journal of Computer Applications 114, no. 5 (2015). https://doi.org/10.5120/19971-1856.

Purba, Johnlar. Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Bermotif Ringan Dengan Restorative Justice. Jakarta: Jala Permata Aksara, 2017.

Putri, Nella Sumika, and I Tajudin. “Kewenangan KPK Untuk Melakukan Penyitaan Terhadap Barang Bukti Yang Diduga Hasil Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Yang Tindak Pidana Asalnya Bukan Berasal Dari Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Padjadjaran Law Review 2 (2014): 1–30.

Rahim, Muhammad Ibnu Fajar, Sitti Arkanul Pascahyati Rahim, Muhammad Aman Hijrah Akbar Rahim, Ahmad Ranuwirawan Rahim, and Abdul Rahim. “Penyitaan Barang Bukti Tindak Pidana Pada Tingkat Pemeriksaan Persidangan.” Pleno Jure 9, no. 1 (2020): 47–57. https://doi.org/10.37541/plenojure.v9i1.389.

Saputra, Andika Deavit, Faris Ali Sidqi, and Yusran bin Darham. “Kewenangan Kejaksaan Dalam Melakukan Penyitaan Terhadap Kekayaan Tersangka Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Universitas Islam Kalimantan, no. 30 (2022).

Suhaimi. “Problem Hukum Dan Pendekatan Dalam Penelitian Hukum Normatif.” Jurnal YUSTITIA 19, no. 2 (2018): 203–10. http://ejournal.unira.ac.id/index.php/yustitia/article/view/477/399.

Suyono, Yoyok Ucuk, and Dadang Firdiyanto. Mediasi Penal Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana. Yogyakarta: Laksbang, 2020.

Syam, Asmadi. Manifesto Keadilan Restoratif. Edited by Mohd. Din. 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Deepublish, 2023.

———. “Measuring the Concept of Restoration in Criminal Justice System.” Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 16, no. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2022.v16.363-376.

———. “Penggeledahan Dan Penyitaan Sebelum Penetapan Tersangka.” Hukum Online, 2021. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/penggeledahan-dan-penyitaan-sebelum-penetapan-tersangka-lt60862f5d1545f/.

Taqiuddin, Habibul Umam. “Penalaran Hukum (Legal Reasoning) Dalam Putusan Hakim.” JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan) 1, no. 2 (2019). https://doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v1i2.343.