Handling Of Crypto Assets As Evidence In Criminal Cases

Authors

  • Muh. Ibnu Fajar
  • Desty Puspita Sari

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64843/prolev.v3i1.31

Keywords:

Handling; Crypto Assets; Evidence

Abstract

The increasing number of users and transactions of crypto assets every year has the potential to increase the modus operandi of criminal acts that use crypto assets, either as a tool to commit a criminal act (instrumental offense) or as a result of a criminal act (corpus delicten). Crypto assets are evidence that are very vulnerable, fluctuating in value, and easily changed and transferred. Therefore, handling must be done quickly and precisely. Handling of crypto assets must comply with the exclusionary of rule principle which requires obtaining evidence in ways that are based on law so that crypto assets become legal evidence (lawfully legal evidence) to be used in proving criminal cases. The prosecutor as case controller (dominus litis) has the responsibility to maintain the integrity of crypto assets as evidence and/or valid evidence, both at the stages of investigation, prosecution, examination at trial, and implementation of court decisions. In practice, there is no legal instrument that specifically regulates procedures for handling crypto assets in criminal cases, giving rise to different handling practices (disparities). Therefore, a common perception is needed regarding the handling of crypto assets as evidence in criminal cases.

References

A. Narayanan, J. Bonneau, E. Felten, A. Miller, & S. Goldfeder, Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Technologies. (2016, February 9). available on https://pdfdirectory.com/pdf/0765-bitcoin-and-cryptocurrency-technologies.pdf, accesed date 23 January 2024.

Andi Hamzah, 2006, KUHP dan KUHAP, Cet. 13, Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Az Zahra Zain Auralia dan Abraham Ferry Rosando, “Perlindungan Hukum Sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Hak Korban Penipuan Uang Kripto Melalui Restitusi”, Bureaucracy Journal: Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, Volume 3, No. 2, (Mei - Agustus 2023).

Bappebti, “(Beritasatu.com) Hingga Agustus, Investor Aset Kripto Naik Jadi 16,1 Juta”, available on https://bappebti.go.id/pojok_media/detail/11410, accesed date 24 October 2023.

Dewa Gede Giri Santosa dan Karell Mawla Ibnu Kamali, “Acquisition And Presentation Of Digital Evidence In Criminal Trial In Indonesia", Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, Volume 11, No. 2, (2022): 195-218.

Djisman Samosir, 2013, Segenggam Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana, Bandung: Nuansa Aulia.

Ferry Mulyanto, "Pemanfaatan Cryptocurrency Sebagai Penerapan Mata Uang Rupiah Kedalam Bentuk Digital Menggunakan Teknologi Bitcoin", Indonesian Journal on Networking and Security, Volume 4, No. 4, (2015): 19-26.

Grégory Claeys, Maria Demertzis and Konstantinos Efstathiou, “Cryptocurrencies and monetary policy”, Bruegel Policy Contribution, No. 2018/10. pg. 1-14.

Hamin, Dewi Indrayani, "Crypto Currensi Dan Pandangan Legalitas Menurut Islam: Sebuah Literature Review", JAMBURA: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen dan Bisnis, Volume 3, No. 2, (2020): 127-139.

Hari Sasangka dan Lily Rosita, 2003, Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Perkara Pidana: Untuk Mahasiswa Dan Praktisi, Bandung: Penerbit Mandar Maju.

https://dspace.uii.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/15797/05.2%20bab%202.pdf?sequence=6&isAllowed=y, accessed date 24 October 2023.

Ira Mirawati, "Pemanfaatan Teori Komunikasi Persuasif Pada Penelitian E-Commerce Di Era Digital", Medium 9, No. 1, (2021): 58-80.

Jan Lansky, "Possible State Approaches To Cryptocurrencies", Journal Of Systems Integration, Volume 9, No. 1, (2018): 19.

K. K. Thakur and Banik, “Cryptocurrency: Its Risks And Gains And The Way Ahead”, Journal of Economics and Finance, Volume 9, No. 2, (2018), 38-42.

M. Karjadi dan R Soesilo, 1997, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana Dengan Penjelasan Resmi dan Komentar, Bogor: Politeia.

Muh. Ibnu Fajar Rahim, "Asas-Asas Hukum Penuntutan", The Prosecutor Law Review Volume 1, No. 1, (2023): 1-36.

Muhammad Syahri Ramadhan, Muslim Nugraha, Alip Dian Pratama, M. Zainul Arifin dan Ricky Saputra, "Aset Kripto sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia (Upaya Ius Constituendum dalam Hukum Bisnis Kontemporer di Indonesia)", Sharia and Law Proceedings, Volume 1, No. 1, (2023): 53-68.

Tim Penyusun Pusat Bahasa, 2005, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Ed. 3 Cet 3, Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Tirta Karma Senjaya, ”Perdagangan, Pengawasan dan Penanganan Barang Bukti Fisik Aset Kripto Di Indonesia”, Presentation Material for the FGD Handling of Evidence in the Form of Crypto Assets in Criminal Cases held by the Legal and Foreign Relations Bureau, Attorney General's Office of Indonesia on 04 October 2023.

Warna Agung Cahyono dan Sri Anggraeni Kusuma Dewi, "Perancangan Pengamanan Situng Form C1 Berbasis Input Desa Dan Output Kecamatan Menggunakan Blockchain", Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi Asia Volume 15, No. 1, (2021): 29-38.

Published

30-04-2025

How to Cite

Muh. Ibnu Fajar, and Desty Puspita Sari. 2025. “Handling Of Crypto Assets As Evidence In Criminal Cases”. The Prosecutor Law Review 3 (1). https://doi.org/10.64843/prolev.v3i1.31.